In message: <20100313090844.gv8...@hoeg.nl>
            Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> writes:
: * Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixma...@gmail.com> wrote:
: > COMPAT_FREEBSD32 is an unfortunate choice. It can be easily
: > interpreted as "compatible with FreeBSD 3.2".
: 
: That's no problem, since COMPAT_FREEBSD%d was already a misnomer. It
: would have been a lot better if it were replaced by a numerical
: definition:
: 
: options       COMPAT_FREEBSD_MAJOR=7

that sounds like a good idea.  But it isn't as simple as changing all
the COMPAT_FREEBSDX in the .c code.  There's also hooks in the syscall
glue generation that would be affected.

Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to