On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:43:38PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:33:03PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Author: ru
> > Date: Fri Feb 12 16:33:03 2010
> > New Revision: 203800
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/203800
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Fixed error checking of pthread(3) functions.
> >   
> >   PR:               143807
> >   Submitted by:     pluknet (partly)
> > 
> > Modified:
> >   head/tools/regression/file/newfileops_on_fork/newfileops_on_fork.c
> >   head/tools/regression/gaithrstress/gaithrstress.c
> >   head/tools/tools/mctest/mctest.cc
> >   head/tools/tools/netrate/http/http.c
> >   head/tools/tools/netrate/httpd/httpd.c
> >   head/tools/tools/netrate/juggle/juggle.c
> > 
> > Modified: head/tools/regression/file/newfileops_on_fork/newfileops_on_fork.c
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/tools/regression/file/newfileops_on_fork/newfileops_on_fork.c      
> > Fri Feb 12 15:07:24 2010        (r203799)
> > +++ head/tools/regression/file/newfileops_on_fork/newfileops_on_fork.c      
> > Fri Feb 12 16:33:03 2010        (r203800)
> > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ main(__unused int argc, __unused char *a
> >             err(-1, "bind");
> >     if (listen(listen_fd, -1) <0)
> >             err(-1, "listen");
> > -   if (pthread_create(&accept_thread, NULL, do_accept, NULL) < 0)
> > +   if (pthread_create(&accept_thread, NULL, do_accept, NULL) != 0)
> >             err(-1, "pthread_create");
> >     sleep(1);       /* Easier than using a CV. */;
> >     do_fork();
> 
> err() uses errno, so this is still not quite right ?

Yes, errc() would be in order here.  "eval" of -1 in the
err() call is also not quite correct, and is silently
converted to 255.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
r...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD committer
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to