On 12 January 2013 11:45, Alfred Perlstein <bri...@mu.org> wrote: > I'm not sure if regressing to the waterfall method of development is a good > idea at this point. > > I see a light at the end of the tunnel and we to continue to just handle > these minor corner cases as we progress. > > If we move to a model where a minor bug is grounds to completely remove > helpful code then nothing will ever get done. >
Allocating 512MB worth of callwheels on a 16GB MIPS machine is a little silly, don't you think? That suggests to me that the extent of which maxfiles/maxusers/etc percolates the codebase wasn't totally understood by those who wish to change it. I'd rather see some more investigative work into outlining things that need fixing and start fixing those, rather than "just change stuff and fix whatever issues creep up." I kinda hope we all understand what we're working on in the kernel a little better than that. Adrian _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
