On 2012-Jul-24 13:57:12 -0400, David Schultz <d...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 24, 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:35AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:13:56PM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> > >   Compute the exponential of x for Intel 80-bit format and IEEE 128-bit
>> > >   format.  These implementations are based on
>> > I believe some ports could benefit from OSVERSION bump for this one.
...
>against.  In this case, it would help any ports that have
>workarounds for the lack of expl() to compile both before and
>after this change.  But it's also important not to bump the
>version gratuitously if there's no reason to believe the change
>might introduce incompatibilities.

Hopefully, this is just the first of a series of similar commits over
the next 4-5 months so if we bump OSVERSION for this, we are probably
looking at another half-dozen or so bumps.  Do any ports actually have
a hard-wired decision for expl() (or other libm functions)?  I would
hope most ports that are interested in complex and/or long double
functions have some sort of configure-time test that will automatically
detect their presence or absence.

-- 
Peter Jeremy

Attachment: pgpd9m8t8j6Dt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to