On 2012-Jul-24 13:57:12 -0400, David Schultz <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2012, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:35AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:13:56PM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote: >> > > Compute the exponential of x for Intel 80-bit format and IEEE 128-bit >> > > format. These implementations are based on >> > I believe some ports could benefit from OSVERSION bump for this one. ... >against. In this case, it would help any ports that have >workarounds for the lack of expl() to compile both before and >after this change. But it's also important not to bump the >version gratuitously if there's no reason to believe the change >might introduce incompatibilities.
Hopefully, this is just the first of a series of similar commits over the next 4-5 months so if we bump OSVERSION for this, we are probably looking at another half-dozen or so bumps. Do any ports actually have a hard-wired decision for expl() (or other libm functions)? I would hope most ports that are interested in complex and/or long double functions have some sort of configure-time test that will automatically detect their presence or absence. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpd9m8t8j6Dt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
