On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:10 +0200 "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freeb...@klop.yi.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:05:00 +0200, Robert Watson <rwat...@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > >> +20101022: > >> + A workaround for a fixed ld bug has been removed in kernel code, > >> + so make sure that your system ld is built from sources after > >> + revision 211583 (r210245 if building stable/8 kernel on head, > >> + r211584 for stable/7). A symptom of incorrect ld version is > >> + different addresses for set_pcpu section and __start_set_pcpu > >> + symbol in kernel and/or modules. > > > > Since many of our users still rely on cvsup to update FreeBSD source, it > > might be useful to provide rough date thresholds for the branches in > > addition to the Subversion changeset numbers (which are less easy to > > deal with when checking out with cvsup/cvs). > > > > Thanks! > > > > Robert > > As a non-freebsd developer is there an advantage to do svn checkout in > stead of c(v)sup? > As a FreeBSD developer (but now only ports), I still use c(v)sup to keep my CVS and src/ports trees up-to-date. I also occasionally check out the svn tree, but far less frequently than CVS. AFAIK the project doesn't have as many svn mirrors as it does CVS mirrors, but I might be wrong. -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
