On 1110T1147, Conrad Meyer wrote:
I am on board with making this stuff more “batteries included” and usable by default, but just echoing the request for configurable knobs (I don’t care about the defaults).My point is... well, there are two. First is, it's configurable already: you can comment out parts of the rc script you don't want, or you can not
We want to have the system rc scripts "no touch" scripts, don't we?
set linux_enable in the first place and do things it would otherwise do for you by in the usual manner - add the modules to loader.conf, add a line to sysctl.conf etc. The script simply provides a shortcut to match what 90% of users want.
I agree.
Second, in order to implement something properly, I need to understand how it's going to be used. I guess I worded it quite badly in the previous mail; it's wasn't supposed to sound like "Can you give me some use case because I think you're wrong", but rather a "Can you give me some use case, because without it I have no idea how to design it to fit it".
What about a config variable which enables or disables the mounts? That way we don't have to modify the rc script to get back to the old behavior in cases were we need it.
Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netch...@freebsd.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
pgpJT_fAArT08.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
