On 1109T2049, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Edward Tomasz Napierala <tr...@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 7 Nov
> 2019 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC)):
>
> > Author: trasz
> > Date: Thu Nov 7 18:15:24 2019
> > New Revision: 354458
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/354458
> >
> > Log:
> > Extend the linux rc script to mount the neccessary file systems,
> > set ELF fallback brand, and load pty(4).
>
> We never did something like that. We have it documented everywhere
> that it needs to be done manually. So this is at least a POLA
> violation. It is great that the nocover option is used in the mount,
> but it's still some kind of layering violation (I may want to have
> only a subset mounted, or nothing at all).
It is kind of a POLA violation, but previously the linux_enable
knob didn't do much apart from loading the linux{,64}.ko kernel
module and doing something weird with ldconfig, which I'm not
even sure is actually useful. In other words, the old behaviour
can be restored by just not using linux_enable, and instead
loading the kernel modules the same way all the others are loaded.
Could you give me some use case why someone would want only a subset
of the filesystems?
> I do not object to the functionality, but I think it needs to be
> configurable (an option to influence if the auto-mount is done or not,
> doesn't matter to me what the default behavior is, as long as it is
> configurable) and documented (UPDATING, handbook, man-pages, maybe
> even the release notes).
Man page updates are pending review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22277.
Good point about the Handbook and release notes; I'll take a look.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
