On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 01:03:42PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> writes: > > To be clear, I am NOT asking for a backout ... IIRC in the thread that > > discussed this issue there were quite a few people who thought that > > FreeBSD not clearing the screen was a POLA violation since that's what > > linux does, and it's what most people are used to. > > It's not "what Linux does", it's what xterm does. Xterm did not > originate with Linux; in fact, it predates Linux by about ten years. > FreeBSD's xterm entry was deliberately crippled to lie about xterm's > capabilities.
Actually it is when the 'ti'/'te' termcap entries are *provided* that one lies about xterm's capabilities. The presence of the 'ti'/'te' termcap capabilities implies that programs must use them when entering/leaving full-screen mode. (Some terminal types need to be in some special mode to allow you to move around the cursor to arbitrary positions.) This is not needed for xterm, and therefore those capabilities should not appear in the termcap entry for xterm. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
