On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: > ... > On 24/01/2018 13:30, Conrad Meyer wrote: >> >> ... >> size_t can handle 10GB, but u_long can't. >> This whole argument hinges upon incorrect assumption that size_t is >> larger than u_long. > > > Hmm... > > Lets just make it "unsigned long" to be consistent with malloc(9) and avoid > confusion?
The opposite, I think -- change malloc(9) and realloc*(9) to size_t to be more consistent with the C standard and malloc(3). Best, Conrad _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
