On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:05:24AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Let's start with his point about u_long vs size_t causing problems: > > void *malloc(unsigned long size, struct malloc_type *type, int flags) > vs > void *mallocarray(size_t nmemb, size_t size, struct malloc_type *type, > > Since size_t is long long on i386, for example, this can result in > undetected overflows. Such inattention to detail makes me extremely uneasy > about the rest of the code.
size_t has same representation as u_long on all supported arches. size_t is 32bit on i386, why could it need to be 64bit on 32bit architecture ? _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
