On Sep 3, 2009, at 2:02 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Thursday 03 September 2009 3:45:07 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
But ciss doesn't reference it at all so either it deviously assumes
it
or is independent of it.
Actually, it may be much worse, it may be that the author of ciss(4)
new that
ciss(4)'s largest supported I/O size was larger than 128k so they
didn't
bother handling the limit at all giving the false impression the
hardware has
no limit.
You're exactly right. The solution is to do a proper audit and fix
the potential problems, not add yet another 1-off flag that avoids
doing real work. If you want to help, keep in mind that I need help
_generating_ patches, not testing them. I appreciate all of the
testing goodwill out there, but analysis and fixing goodwill is needed
at this phase.
Scott
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
