On Thursday 03 September 2009 3:45:07 pm Ivan Voras wrote: > But ciss doesn't reference it at all so either it deviously assumes it > or is independent of it.
Actually, it may be much worse, it may be that the author of ciss(4) new that ciss(4)'s largest supported I/O size was larger than 128k so they didn't bother handling the limit at all giving the false impression the hardware has no limit. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
