At 2:09 PM -0700 6/30/09, Sam Leffler wrote:
I have yet to hear a compelling argument for why wake was chosen
over an existing tool that's been successfully used for a while.
OTOH this isn't something that'll keep me up at night; it just seems
like an ill-advised rush job that completely violates the intent of
the 8.0 code freeze..
Sam
I agree completely with what Sam is saying here. I don't see why this
had to be done at the time it was done (WRT a code freeze), and without
any discussion about adding it to FreeBSD. I also agree that it won't
be keeping me up at night, because I'm about to go on vacation for 10-12
days here. But as Warner noted, "this leaves a bad taste in everybody's
mouth, even if at the end of the day you get your way"
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = dros...@rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or g...@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
