2009/6/30 Marc Balmer <m...@msys.ch>: > > Am 30.06.2009 um 21:36 schrieb M. Warner Losh: > >> wake really is too generic a name for this. Why didn't the wol port >> get committed anyway, it seems to be better than this... > > wake is a short, mnemonic and imperative name that describes what the > command does. It is exactly the same command as in NetBSD.
"wake(8)" seems more complementary to "zzz(8)" :) +1 for the tool, -1 for the name. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
