Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 30.06.2009 um 21:36 schrieb M. Warner Losh:
wake really is too generic a name for this. Why didn't the wol port
get committed anyway, it seems to be better than this...
wake is a short, mnemonic and imperative name that describes what the
command does. It is exactly the same command as in NetBSD.
And you're conveniently ignoring the "discussion" that took place after
the netbsd drive-by.
Sam
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
