* Bruce Evans <b...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Review of what I can quote easily in mail: this url appears to be
> syntactically correct.
>
> This is OK, but I would prefer to use temporary hacks in machdep.c
> than to mess up cpufunc.h with macros.  Temporary until machdep.c is
> done right.  In one right version, a file other than machdep.c would
> provide all the functions in cpufunc.h as extern functions callable
> by ddb, and _all_ the functions in cpufunc.h certainly shouldn't be
> messed up with macros.

Yes, that's true. I guess I'll just change volatile -> __volatile in
cpufunc.h to match the rest of the file.

-- 
 Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

Attachment: pgpUGNfOx5jH8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to