Thanks! Thats really good to know (and much less of a commitment).

On Sep 22, 2018, 3:19 PM -0600, Aaron Heller <ajhel...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> The is known as the "substitution method" in microphone calibration
> literature.
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:07 AM Fons Adriaensen <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:18:54PM -0600, Jonathan Kawchuk wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also curious if anyone has experimented with running an inverse EQ
> > > calibration curve for your your sweep speakers in order to compensate for
> > > inherent peaks and valleys in the speaker’s frequency response during
> > > impulse response capture. Not sure if this is needed or if a sweep
> > > generally irons out these inconsistencies?
> >
> > The way this is usually done is to record a sweep using an omni
> > measurement mic, compute the inverse EQ from that and apply it
> > to the measured IRs, not to the speaker signal (the net effect
> > is the same).
> >
> > --
> > FA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> > edit account or options, view archives and so on.
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180922/31c1eee4/attachment.html
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
> account or options, view archives and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180922/1dfcfceb/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to