Thanks! Thats really good to know (and much less of a commitment).
On Sep 22, 2018, 3:19 PM -0600, Aaron Heller <ajhel...@gmail.com>, wrote: > The is known as the "substitution method" in microphone calibration > literature. > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:07 AM Fons Adriaensen <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:18:54PM -0600, Jonathan Kawchuk wrote: > > > > > I'm also curious if anyone has experimented with running an inverse EQ > > > calibration curve for your your sweep speakers in order to compensate for > > > inherent peaks and valleys in the speaker’s frequency response during > > > impulse response capture. Not sure if this is needed or if a sweep > > > generally irons out these inconsistencies? > > > > The way this is usually done is to record a sweep using an omni > > measurement mic, compute the inverse EQ from that and apply it > > to the measured IRs, not to the speaker signal (the net effect > > is the same). > > > > -- > > FA > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180922/31c1eee4/attachment.html > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit > account or options, view archives and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180922/1dfcfceb/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
