The is known as the "substitution method" in microphone calibration literature.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:07 AM Fons Adriaensen <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:18:54PM -0600, Jonathan Kawchuk wrote: > > > I'm also curious if anyone has experimented with running an inverse EQ > > calibration curve for your your sweep speakers in order to compensate for > > inherent peaks and valleys in the speaker’s frequency response during > > impulse response capture. Not sure if this is needed or if a sweep > > generally irons out these inconsistencies? > > The way this is usually done is to record a sweep using an omni > measurement mic, compute the inverse EQ from that and apply it > to the measured IRs, not to the speaker signal (the net effect > is the same). > > -- > FA > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180922/31c1eee4/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
