Hi Stefan,

On 07 Jun 2016, at 04:35, Stefan Schreiber 
<st...@mail.telepac.pt<mailto:st...@mail.telepac.pt>> wrote:

Politis Archontis wrote:

But instead of combining all microphones to generate the binaural directivities 
(as in ambisonics), it interpolates only between the two adjacent microphones 
that should be closest to the listener’s ears. Otherwise, it does not capture 
pinna cues or cues from a non-spherical/assymetrical head.
Any source  for this explanation?

I actually dare to question your view... How will you receive any binaural cues 
via interpolation between two relatively closely spaced omni mikes (fixed on a 
sphere)?

As you even write, this doesn't seem to give any head and pinna cues. (It's 
called MTB. So I guess they would aim to provide several binaural perspectives, 
including head and pinna cues?)

The source is the AES paper describing the method:

Algazi, R. V., Duda, R. O., & Thompson, D. M. (2004). Motion-Tracked Binaural 
Sound. In 116th AES Convention. Berlin, Germany.

It does give head-related cues, that of a spherical head without pinna. If you 
put an omni on a rigid sphere, it is not an omni anymore, it has a 
frequency-dependent directionality, if you put two of them at opposite sides, 
they have opposite directionalities and introduce inter-channel level 
differences. Depending on the size of the sphere, the two signals have a 
direction-dependent phase-difference too. If the size of the sphere is 
approximately the size of a head, then you can assume that the level and time 
differences are close to the binaural ones. This is the infamous spherical head 
model, and its ITDs and ILDs are known analytically. It captures the cues for 
lateralization, but not for a pinna (that it doesn’t have) or for head 
assymetries.

If instead of two omnis, you put many of them on the horizontal plane, then you 
can track the listener’s head yaw rotation and use the two omnis that are 
closer to their ears - or interpolate for a smoother transition. That’s what 
Algazi and Duda are doing in their paper, and they compare various 
interpolation schemes.

Regards,
Archontis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160607/4d3112ff/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to