On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:53:46 +0530, umashankar manthravadi <umasha...@hotmail.com> wrote :
> VVaudio working in audio mulch will accept midi to control parameters > like azimuth and elevation. There are plenty of two board (but tiny > boards) that will provide usb output from a 9degrees of freedom > chip. We just need to convert X and Y to midistreams. I'd be curious to see a list of appropriate sensors and boards. Fons is already working on a similar project; we'll learn more when it's ready. > Would like to see it integrated audio on USB but we need not start > there. It would keep the device small, cheaper, and compatible with many systems that already have a headphone output. But there's probably small and cheap usb headphone amplifier modules that could be integrated. > I am sure it can be used with ambisonics.xyz too, but is that site > dead ? It's http://ambisonic.xyz/ (without a s). It still works (but only for Chrome based browsers) -- Marc > umashankar > > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > From: Marc Lavallée<mailto:m...@hacklava.net> > Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 7:37 AM > To: Surround Sound discussion group<mailto:sursound@music.vt.edu> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Never do electronic in public. > > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:17:42 +0000, > Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote : > > > Again: You need a defined plan what your device is supposed to do, > > to connect to which devices (PCs? iOS/Android devices? ...), etc. > > The plan is to track the orientation of a moving body part that is > known to affect our ability to localize sound; according to recent > scientific studies, the head is a prime suspect. The connectivity > could be an option: serial, usb, wifi or bluetooth. Such a project > does not need all parameters to be defined in the rock, and > prototypes are required. > > > Anyway: Isn't your project pretty finished when you will have > > decided on the new < reference hardware >? I see this as an open > > hardware project. Software/apps can be written later. You maybe > > would have to implement just one < reference appliance >, which > > could be a PC solution, or an Ambisonics playback app for Android. > > The FreeIMU project was open (and is probably no longer maintained). > We can expect sensors, processors and transmitters to be updated > regularly, so I prefer to avoid defining a reference hardware. Simply, > a head tracking gizmo could be able to work with any software that > requires it, so the more open the better. The protocol is probably > more important than the hardware, which could vary. > > > * FSSC = Fast and Simple Sound Control. The name is the aim... :-D > > OSC is not ideal for slow links, because it requires a minimum of 24 > bytes to send a single value... The Firmata protocol could be a better > choice: https://github.com/firmata > http://firmata.org/wiki/Design_Issues > > -- > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe > here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
