I dont understand the question either ! Does MS stand for mono/stereo ? Not
naive enough for my liking !!!!
On 8 May 2013 20:31, Martin Leese <martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> revery wrote:
>
> > I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2
> > channel, by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
> > Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
> > required, or maybe just a level change between M and S?
> > My purpose is to be able use say Harpex to to do the extra magic it does
> > with converting to different microphone configurations etc, and the
> > possibilities with double MS.
>
> I am not sure I understand your question
> ("using an ambisonic decoder to create the
> stereo" and "double MS" puzzle me), but have
> you looked at Super Stereo? This uses an
> Ambisonic decoder to reproduce stereo
> sources; visit:
> http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/Ambisonic/faq_section10.html
>
> 1980s domestic Ambisonic decoders had a
> Super Stereo mode, but I don't know if Harpex
> does. The decoding equations are in a PDF
> file available at:
> https://sites.google.com/site/mytemporarydownloads/
>
> Look under "Ambisonic stuff".
>
> Regards,
> Martin
> --
> Martin J Leese
> E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org
> Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130509/c6042396/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
