Youre only interested in ambisonics right ? Because generally the further away something is the less high frequencies it has due to air absorbtion of sound frequencies with shorter wavelengths. Also the reverberation to soundsource ratio will be higher than for more distant objects. These are psycoacoustic effects though so excuse me if my answer is not relevant.
On 3 May 2013 12:00, Iain Mott <m...@reverberant.com> wrote: > Hi list, I wonder if someone could clear up some doubts I have: > > Does an ambisonic impulse response recorded in a space, with microphone > and impulse source at specific locations, reproduce any distance cues > when convolved with an anechoic mono source and decoded ambisonically > over a speaker array, or just angular cues? > > I know that HRTF filters are recorded anecoically, so distance of the > impulse wouldn't matter, as i understand it. But what if impulses were > recorded at various angles and a particular distance in a live room? How > would one set of angular responses at a given distance compare with > another set made with the same angles but at a different distance? > > Thanks, > > Iain > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130503/3e17b6dc/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
