On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote:
> Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
>>
>> for larger audiences, the game seems to be a bit different, although i
>> don't quite understand why. i find 1st order over eight speakers covers
>> a larger area more easily and uniformly than six, but the theory says it
>> shouldn't, because outside the sweet spot, rV reconstruction is mostly
>> not happening and everything relies on rE, which is degraded by using
>> more speakers than necessary...

r_E is not degraded. r_E remains the same for any uniform layout with
more than the minimum number of speakers.

> But < why > ?
>
> It is important for theoretical reasons to discuss this a bit more. This is
> not anything "evident", I would think.
>

I believe the reasoning is that when there are many speakers producing
almost the same signal, you get more comb filtering effects when
moving out of the sweet spot.  This is discussed in

 Solvang, Audun. "Spectral Impairment of Two-Dimensional Higher Order
Ambisonics" JAES Volume 56 Issue 4 pp. 267-279; April 2008.

however the paper doesn't specify the decoder used.  I've seen many
reports of comb-filter effects and then found that  "matching" (aka
velocity, basic) decoders were being used at HF.  (we discuss this in
BLaH3).   In fact, the only time I've ever heard comb filtering in
Ambi playback is with incorrect decoders.

I will say that when Eric, Richard, and I set up a demo during the
2008 AES in San Francisco, using the 24-speaker hemisphere array at
"the Bubble", there was a distinct HF dip at the sweet spot, but we
didn't have precise info about the locations of the speakers and
didn't have a lot of time to make measurements or tweak the decoder
before the demo.  Moving 10-20cm away from the sweet spot in any
direction restored the HF response, but there were no comb filtering
effects.  The configuration was 3 rings of eight speakers, with some
of the speaker behind a projection screen.

For the informal listening tests reported in our papers, the speaker
location error is less than 1 cm. This is verified by placing an omni
microphone at the listening spot and driving the speakers with
impulses.

Since the topic is domestic speaker layouts, I have a permanent four
speaker rectangle set up in our living room, with two more speakers on
stands that can be put in place to make a hexagon.  I've also
experimented with an eight-speaker bi-rectangle for 1st-order
periphony, but that stretched the limits of domestic acceptability.

Aaron Heller <hel...@ai.sri.com>
Menlo Park, CA  US
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to