On 2010-11-04, [email protected] wrote:
But it should have been clear that the context was testing some code supposed to produce a max-rE decode but failing to do so. The question then is why not - is the code buggy or are my expectations wrong (it turned out to be the last).
And my tentative answer was that with rE that could perhaps be expected, unlike with in-phase.
Suggesting to do something completely different *is* completely out of touch with the original message.
I suggested a test because I was not sure whether my explanation had any real traction.
In any case, no harm done, no foul. Just an idea on my part, I never meant to disturb the work you're doing. :)
-- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - [email protected], http://decoy.iki.fi/front +358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2 _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
