On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:08:21AM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > On 2010-11-03, [email protected] wrote: > > >I'm still not sure what is bothering me about this but I _think_ > >it's something to do with the precise nature of the relationship > >between the symmetries in the icosahedron and the symmetries in > >the 3rd order spherical harmonics. > > Hmm. Why don't you first try a conservative, in-phase decode? If > that works better, then try moving the array closer, or at least > some of its constituent speakers. I mean, we've already hashed out > what the nulls of the spherically symmetrical Bessel functions could > do to a mike. In this case it just might be those same nulls are > proving to be a problem at the low-to-mid frequencies, for the > reproduction array as well.
Seems you are completely out of touch with the context of this thread. > That sort of thing would never be a problem if we only used a naïve > (or in-phase) decode. But then we go with rV and rE as well, where > standing waves matter, and so the radial, Bessel-part of the > solution to the wave equation matters just as much. In there the > distance symmetry is broken, evenas the directional one isn't. There's nothing 'naïve' about in-phase. It may look as something fundamental to you but it isn't. Ciao, -- FA There are three of them, and Alleline. _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
