Ray_Net wrote: > Richmond wrote on 05-05-18 01:11: >> EE wrote: >>> Richmond wrote: >>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>> Richmond wrote: >>>>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>>>> Richmond wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it >>>>>>>> does not >>>>>>>> show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded >>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>> from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least >>>>>>>> say >>>>>>>> that there are attachments without trying any further >>>>>>>> interpretation. >>>>>>> Not sure what you mean "show attachments," but there are a couple of >>>>>>> ways for you to detect that a message contains an attachment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>> None of those options work if you have View Message Body As Plain >>>>>> Text. >>>>>> It is as if there are no attachments, no paperclips, no save as >>>>>> options, >>>>>> nothing. At the very least I would thing plain text would include >>>>>> vision >>>>>> of the attachment headers, although that would be a rather messy >>>>>> way of >>>>>> doing it. >>>>> >>>>> I tested your claim here with messages originally written in HTML and >>>>> with messages originally written in plain text, and in all cases the >>>>> options I described worked as expected. I tested with View Message >>>>> Body >>>>> As Plain Text and with View Message Body As Original HTML, and it made >>>>> no difference. >>>>> >>>>> SM 2.49.2, Win7 Pro SP1, SeaMonkey Default Theme. >>>>> >>>> It seems that some attachments do work, and some don't. In this >>>> instance >>>> it is a forwarded message (i.e. forwarded to me from someone with an >>>> apple client who received a message with attachments). >>>> >>>> The message and its attachments display OK in Gmail webmail, and >>>> also on >>>> my Iphone mail client. >>>> >>> From what I understood from using Thunderbird, attachments are removed >>> from messages before forwarding them. >>> >> I have found another example where I sent an email to myself from my >> iPhone. The attachment is not recognized until I change the view from >> plain text to original HTML. I can't see any reason for this, especially >> as it is not consistent. If there is a reason for it, then it would >> apply to all attachments, not just those from Apple clients. So I >> conclude that SM is not handling attachments from Apple properly. >> (Whether because of Apple, or because of SM). > May be because the picture is not an attachment, but is a part of the > HTML body only.
It is not a picture. In fact there were three attachments, all of which were docx. The headers show "Content-Disposition: attachment;" _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
