EE wrote: > Richmond wrote: >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> Richmond wrote: >>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>> Richmond wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not >>>>>> show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded >>>>>> message >>>>>> from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least >>>>>> say >>>>>> that there are attachments without trying any further interpretation. >>>>> >>>>> Not sure what you mean "show attachments," but there are a couple of >>>>> ways for you to detect that a message contains an attachment. >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>> >>>> None of those options work if you have View Message Body As Plain Text. >>>> It is as if there are no attachments, no paperclips, no save as >>>> options, >>>> nothing. At the very least I would thing plain text would include >>>> vision >>>> of the attachment headers, although that would be a rather messy way of >>>> doing it. >>> >>> >>> I tested your claim here with messages originally written in HTML and >>> with messages originally written in plain text, and in all cases the >>> options I described worked as expected. I tested with View Message Body >>> As Plain Text and with View Message Body As Original HTML, and it made >>> no difference. >>> >>> SM 2.49.2, Win7 Pro SP1, SeaMonkey Default Theme. >>> >> >> It seems that some attachments do work, and some don't. In this instance >> it is a forwarded message (i.e. forwarded to me from someone with an >> apple client who received a message with attachments). >> >> The message and its attachments display OK in Gmail webmail, and also on >> my Iphone mail client. >> > From what I understood from using Thunderbird, attachments are removed > from messages before forwarding them. >
I have found another example where I sent an email to myself from my iPhone. The attachment is not recognized until I change the view from plain text to original HTML. I can't see any reason for this, especially as it is not consistent. If there is a reason for it, then it would apply to all attachments, not just those from Apple clients. So I conclude that SM is not handling attachments from Apple properly. (Whether because of Apple, or because of SM). _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
