Hi Jordi,

I appreciate your perspective, and thank you for communicating it. I feel that 
the number of contributions and the appetite for sunset4 contributions in the 
IETF is far more telling than the percentage of list members who contribute or 
don’t contribute.

As per my email to Mikael, I am willing to keep the list alive until March next 
year, and we can reevaluate then.

Thanks
Terry

On 15/05/2018, 17:09, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    I disagree with this decision.
    
    Just look into any other WG. Compare the number of people in the mailing 
list and the number of contributions.
    
    This is a general issue in IETF, most of the people in the list is not 
really contributing at all.
    
    I think sunset4 is needed, and it may happen that the pace of the work, is 
a bit slower than in other WGs, but we should keep the WG alive.
    
    It is possible to at least keep the mailing list working?
    
    Regards,
    Jordi
     
     
    -----Mensaje original-----
    De: sunset4 <[email protected]> en nombre de Terry Manderson 
<[email protected]>
    Fecha: martes, 15 de mayo de 2018, 6:51
    Para: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Asunto: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4
    
        Dear WG,
        
        I feel the time has come to close Sunset4. As you all must realise IETF 
Working Groups are there to do work, and in discussion with the co-chairs it 
appears that the list of potential work for Sunset4 has dried up. It may be 
that some activity on a similar topic is needed in the future, however I feel 
that a future body of work should have a different charter specifically for 
that item. It has also been made quite clear with the discussions surrounding 
the last Sunset4 WG item that the IETF and the internet industry are simply not 
ready to change the status of IPv4 while, in reality, the move to IPv6 (only) 
will be a very long-tailed exercise. 
        
        I’d like to thank all WG member’s contributions over the life of this 
WG. Some of the discussions have been both exciting and insightful. 
        
        As AD, I would especially like to thank Marc Blanchet and Wes George 
for co-chairing Sunset4 with professionalism and enthusiasm. Thanks Marc and 
Wes!!
        
        The WG will be officially closed later this week, along with the 
mailing list.
        
        Thank you all!
        
        Cheers
        Terry (responsible AD for Sunset4)
        _______________________________________________
        sunset4 mailing list
        [email protected]
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
        
    
    
    
    **********************************************
    IPv4 is over
    Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    http://www.consulintel.es
    The IPv6 Company
    
    This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    sunset4 mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
    

_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

Reply via email to