On Tue, 15 May 2018, Terry Manderson wrote:
different charter specifically for that item. It has also been made
quite clear with the discussions surrounding the last Sunset4 WG item
that the IETF and the internet industry are simply not ready to change
the status of IPv4 while, in reality, the move to IPv6 (only) will be a
very long-tailed exercise.
When MIF was closed, work was directed to another working group.
I'd like to see similar guidance for the closing of this WG. There is
still work to be done, for instance the discussions in v6ops/6man on an
"no-v4-here"-flag is quite obvious fit there, but other
discussions/guidance on how to behave when there seems to be no IPv4
around, where should this take place? For instance discussions on backoff
timers for DHCPv4 / DNSSD v4 usage in the abscence of no automatic v4 seen
when connecting?
I can understand that the discussions we've had are not enough to warrant
a WG, but it doesn't mean there are no discussions at all. It would be
good if they had a home.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
