On Jul 28, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan didn't say "broken", he said "attacker-controlled", possibly (my guess) > thinking of the infamous "SLAAC attack" [*]. Happy eyeballs is useless here.
This is the MiTM attack I referred to in the previous message. If you are not using secure protocols, you are always vulnerable to MiTM. _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
