On Jul 24, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Lorenzo spoke at the mic about a "drive-by" attack on an IPv4-only network.
> I just want to make it clear about who and how people is impacted.
>  1) It's an IPv4-only network.
>  2) It has "modern" hosts, built after publication of 
> draft-ietf-sunset4-noipv4.
>  3) It's open to some form of attackers.

Specifically, the network has to allow an arbitrary host to send an IPv6 RA.  
Doesn't that open the network to a pile of attacks, including an 
attacker-controlled IPv6 DNS server (RFC6106) and attacker-controlled IPv6 
default route?

-d


> 
> So the "Starbucks" coffee-shop network of 2018.
> It seems somewhat realistic to me.
> 
> I'm excluding home wifi networks, because I assume that they are either
> layer-2 secure, or can identify brother/sister attacks through other means.
> 
> The attacker sends a number of IPv6 RAs per second.
> They don't have to use a lot of bandwidth to do this; they just need to to
> beat the newly booting/connecting host's emitting a DHCPv4 DISCOVER.
> 
> The host, ignoring that this is a hint, has to suppress *all* DHCPv4 DISCOVER
> messages when it sees the RA noipv4 option.
> 
> If the host has successfully sent a DISCOVERY message, it might get an DHCPv4
> OFFER, which may or may not be bogus (maybe the RA is legit and the DHCP is
> bogus), and if it does, it would assume that there is v4, and would configure
> IPv4.
> 
> I think that Lorenzo's concerns are real.
> He feels, I think, that given the degree to which the noipv4 option would be
> a hint to do DHCPv4 less often, rather than to turn it off completely, that
> it would therefore become useless.
> 
> My understanding is that the problem with DHCPv4 discovers is that they are
> layer-2 broadcasts, and just asking it killing some larger networks that were
> trying to benefit from savings by deploying IPv6.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

Reply via email to