Gene, David, Agreed that the technical problem is largely solved with cake & codel.
Also that demos are good. How to do one for this problem> — Jim > The bandwidth mantra has been used for so long that a technical discussion > cannot unseat the mantra. > Some technical parties use the mantra to sell more, faster, ineffective > service. Gullible customers accept that they would be happy if they could > afford even more speed. > > Shouldn’t we create a demo to show the solution? > To show is more effective than to debate. It is impossible to explain to some > people. > Has anyone tried to create a demo (to unseat the bandwidth mantra)? > Is an effective demo too complicated to create? > I’d be glad to participate in defining a demo and publicity campaign. > > Gene > > >> On Apr 30, 2024, at 2:36 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm >> <mailto:da...@lang.hm>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote: >> >>> I am always surprised how complicated these discussions become. (Surprised >>> mostly because I forgot the kind of issues this community care about.) The >>> discussion doesn’t shed light on the following scenarios. >>> >>> While watching stream content, activating controls needed to switch content >>> sometimes (often?) have long pauses. I attribute that to buffer bloat and >>> high latency. >>> >>> With a happy household user watching streaming media, a second user could >>> have terrible shopping experience with Amazon. The interactive response >>> could be (is often) horrible. (Personally, I would be doing email and >>> working on a shared doc. The Amazon analogy probably applies to more >>> people.) >>> >>> How can we deliver graceful performance to both persons in a household? >>> Is seeking graceful performance too complicated to improve? >>> (I said “graceful” to allow technical flexibility.) >> >> it's largely a solved problem from a technical point of view. fq_codel and >> cake solve this. >> >> The solution is just not deployed widely, instead people argue that more >> bandwidth is needed instead.
_______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink