While nobody reads footnotes much, and I would really like you to cite this as the instigator of a lot of research into this area, also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw because of all that rage and frustration is what keyed off 3 years of effort. Think of it as newton noticed an apple, falling from a tree. This is also a good cite, in terms of flavoring your methods to a level that I can tolerate. https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2014/doc/slides/137.pdf I will go through more of the footnotes when I have time, starting with the first. It is also plausible that Starlink employs active queue management (AQM) techniques [1] to moderate uplink latencies under congestion. Um... it does not look like it to my eye. Just a overly short packet FIFO. I haven´t torn it apart lately however. You can easily tell the difference in packet loss behaviors by tearing apart rrul packet captures. On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 1:13 PM Nitinder Mohan via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Our comprehensive multifaceted measurement study looking at Starlink global > and last-mile performance is now available online: > https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09242. > > TL;DR: See the summary in this nice teaser video we made: > https://youtu.be/WtE3MoK8J80 > > We looked at several third-party measurement sources (M-Lab, RIPE Atlas) and > performed our own measurements over multiple Starlink dishes to uncover the > following: > > 1. How different is Starlink network performance globally? How do ground > station and PoP availability impact performance? > 2. How much latency is consumed by the satellite part of the link? > 3. Is Starlink connection affected by bufferbloat? > 4. Are satellite handovers the root-cause of Starlink 15-sec reconfigurations? > 5. How good is Starlink compared to terrestrial cellular networks for > real-time applications, specifically Cloud Gaming and Zoom. > > The study has been accepted and will appear in ACM The Web Conference 2024 > (WWW), which is a flagship venue that has historically housed several > pioneering works central to Internet success. > > Feel free to let me know if you have any questions related to the work. > > P.S. We also thanked this mailing list in our paper for providing us several > key insights and inquisitive discussions :) > > Thanks and Regards > > Nitinder Mohan > Technical University Munich (TUM) > https://www.nitindermohan.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink -- https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/2024_predictions/ Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
