Hi David,Commenting out that test and the following one that were both failing, there are only two other tests that failed. These were in the test private data section towards the end:
13) data: Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!! mpd(Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!!): Msg: ******************** apd(Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!!): !...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!@!! rpd(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!@!!, 1): Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!! rpd(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!@!!, 2): Msg: Pw: !...@pw@!! rpd(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!@!!, 0): Msg: Pw: pw epd(Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!!): Msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!! apd(Msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!): !...@msg: ^...@pw: ^^...@pw^^^@!...@!!rpd(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^^...@pw^^^@!...@!!, 1): !...@msg: ^...@pw: ^^!! @p...@!!^@!! ERROR: removePrivacyDelimiters(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!, 1) != Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!! rpd(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^^...@pw^^^@!...@!!, 0): !...@msg: ^...@pw: ^^!! @p...@!!^@!! ERROR: removePrivacyDelimiters(!...@msg: ^...@pw: ^...@pw^^@!...@!!, 0) != Msg: !...@pw: ^...@pw^@!...@!!
If these are all known errors then I will submit the 2.5 build of PYSTAF.so. Thanks.
Kind regards, Cynthia On Jul 29, 2009, at 2:24 PM, David Bender wrote:
Hi Cynthia,You can ignore that error. It is an issue with the test program (we also get this error on other Unix platforms).Thanks, David David Bender STAF/STAX Development IBM Software Group, WPLC 11501 Burnet Rd. Bldg. 903-5B002 Austin, TX 78758-3400 Phone (T/L): 1-512-286-5315 (363-5315) ITN: 23635315 Email: bda...@us.ibm.com Cynthia Sadler <cynthia.sad...@unboundid.com> 07/29/2009 02:19 PM To David Bender/Austin/i...@ibmus cc staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject Re: [staf-users] Errors building STAF Python on Mac OS X Hi David, I was indeed able to build the PYSTAF.so file. However, when I ran the src/staf/lang/python/TestPython.py script, it did not complete with this error: Testing unmarshalling using IGNORE_INDIRECT_OBJECTS flag and testing that can correctly access the data for a file containing marshalled data returned by a PROCESS START request Process Stdout File Data (containing valid marshalled data): @SDT/{:177::2:r...@sdt/:1:0:6:ipi...@sdt/: 36:9.42.126.76x255.255.252.0x9.42.124.1:3:m...@sdt/:46:Static IP arguments are processed successfully:9:timest...@sdt/:19:2009-01-16 14:41:45 ERROR: Returned data not same as original stdout file contents Expected: @SDT/{:177::2:r...@sdt/$S:1:0:6:ipi...@sdt/$S: 36:9.42.126.76x255.255.252.0x9.42.124.1:3:m...@sdt/$S:46:Static IP arguments are processed successfully:9:timest...@sdt/$S:19:2009-01-16 14:41:45 Found: @SDT/{:177::2:r...@sdt/:1:0:6:ipi...@sdt/: 36:9.42.126.76x255.255.252.0x9.42.124.1:3:m...@sdt/:46:Static IP arguments are processed successfully:9:timest...@sdt/:19:2009-01-16 14:41:45 I don't forsee us needing the IGNORE_INDIRECT_OBJECTS flag for unmarshall, but I'd feel better about contributing my 2.5 version of PYSTAF.so build if the TestPython.py script were to pass completely. What are your thoughts on this? Kind regards, Cynthia
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ staf-users mailing list staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
