Hi! > On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:48:52 -0500 > Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > > > Kurt Jaeger <p...@freebsd.org> writes: > > > > > I had thought that the ZFS fix is a kernel fix so that the kernel > > > would also report -p1, but it does not. It might be because > > > zfs is a kernel module, so the kernel itself was not really patched, > > > but I might be wrong here. > > > > As far as I can see, that seems exactly right. > > As this kind of confusion caused by mismatch of patchlevel between > kernel and userland arises from time to time, now would be the time to > switch to keep patchlevel in sync between kernel and userland.
I'm fine with a little confusion if there's less churn during updates. > What was worse this time was that a non-in-kernel-but-in-tree module, > zfs.ko, is updated but kernel itself is not updated. It happens not very much, so it really does not matter. A note in the EN would be sufficient from my point of view. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
