Thank you! Am Di., 15. Nov. 2022 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Shiro Kawai <shiro.ka...@gmail.com>: > > It says "Returns ... constructed by continuation-mark-set->list when applied > to the same arguments", but continuation-mark-set->iterator takes key-list, > while continuation-mark-set->list takes a single key. Reference > implementation suggests it is intended to be continuation-mark-set->list*.
Indeed; the * is missing in the text. > > If that's the case, "A correct but possibly inefficient implementation" shown > in the entry needs to be adjusted as well. Fixed (in personal repo).
