On 10/04/16 21:57, Marrold wrote: > I've been doing some experimentation with t_any_timeout() > and t_branch_timeout(), and I've observed they return true if either > the initial invite receives no response, or if the 200 OK is not > acknowledged by the UAC. > > Is there any way of differentiating between these scenarios? If Kamailio matches the 200ok for transaction, then it should not give true for a timeout check. But maybe there is a mismatch also in kamailio if the 200ok is sent to caller but it is no ACK sent back. In such case, a sip network trace will be useful to investigate what happens there.
Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
