Hi Igor, that's bit strange, since the rtpproxy is not checking any of the rtp flags including marker bit. It would help if you can post a tcpdump capture of the streams in question along with the log output of the rtpproxy running at the "dbug" level. Thanks! On Mar 5, 2015 5:54 AM, "Igor Potjevlesch" <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I reviewed again a call trace and I can be more precise: a RTP packet > comes with a new SSRC and the Marker bit set to "True". This packet is > properly forwarded. > > > > Then, just after this packet, another RTP packet containing a new SSRC > with the huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True" is coming from the > UA. > > The RTPProxy stops forward since this packet. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :* Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* jeudi 5 mars 2015 11:34 > *À :* mico...@gmail.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue? > > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you. > > > > Just to let you know, the RTPProxy is running in bridging mode. > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org > <sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>] *De la part de* > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > *Envoyé :* jeudi 5 mars 2015 09:33 > *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy issue? > > > > Hello, > > maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights. > > Cheers, > DAniel > > On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or > "Marker bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224). > > > > The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this > call on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual streams > are ok. > > When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP packet > with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True". > > > > Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from A > to B. B to C is still working. > > > > Anyone have an idea? > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > -- > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > > Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 > > Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
