Hello, maybe Maxim (cc-ed) will be able to provide more insights.
Cheers, DAniel On 04/03/15 16:59, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or > "Marker bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224). > > > > The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this > call on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual > streams are ok. > > When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP > packet with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True". > > > > Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from > A to B. B to C is still working. > > > > Anyone have an idea? > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
