Hello,
On 11/12/13 09:38, Alex Balashov wrote:
Carsten,
On 12/11/2013 03:36 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
why should Kamailio add a route for himself to an outbound request?
172.30.105.18 is obviously the proxy itself; so adding the
Route-Header makes no sense.... (at least from a SIP-Perspective).
Record-Route:
<sip:172.30.105.18;lr=on;ftag=ervXH3ycHcgpK;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;proxy_media=yes;dlgcor=fa8.9ea>
03:27:37.464071 IP 172.30.105.18.5060 > 172.30.105.20.5060: SIP,
length: 367
Or am i missing something here?
That depends, philosophically, on whether the intention of this
feature is to spoof BYEs so that they appear to come from the
respective UAs toward each other through the proxy (or, in substance,
act as if they were), or for Kamailio to unexpectedly take on the role
of a UAC mid-call. :-)
there must not be any route for proxy itself, even when BYE is sent by
end UA the Route is consumed by proxy, so it is no difference from this
perspective.
In the initial email on this thread, there was a second proxy, so I
wanted to see the route header stored for that proxy.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
