I just tested this with dialog timeout and can confirm that there are no
Route headers in the locally generated BYEs.
The Record-Route set for the dialog is:
Record-Route:
<sip:172.30.105.18;lr=on;ftag=ervXH3ycHcgpK;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--;proxy_media=yes;dlgcor=fa8.9ea>
The BYEs from Kamailio don't have a Route header at all. Just these:
03:27:37.464071 IP 172.30.105.18.5060 > 172.30.105.20.5060: SIP, length: 367
E.......@._'.4..?..U.....w^.BYE sip:mod_sofia@172.30.105.20:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.30.105.18;branch=z9hG4bK6e86.3c0a9a04000000000000000000000000.0
To: <sip:6785551212@172.30.105.20>;tag=ervXH3ycHcgpK
From:
<sip:4045551212@172.30.105.18>;tag=SD7hk6c99-ac3f4687+1+337b0015+5485357b
CSeq: 1 BYE
Call-ID: 34fdb244-dce1-1231-ee8e-00163e6490b7
Content-Length: 0
Max-Forwards: 70
Of course, that doesn't stop them from working.
-- Alex
On 12/11/2013 02:50 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
can you share the database record or kamctl mi dlg_list for such call?
It helps to see if record route values are stored properly in first place.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/12/13 14:47, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi,
I locally generate BYE using dlg_end_dlg. When I want to end a call
that is "transport layer" bridged, the BYE is not sent to first hop in
route_set but directly to the endpoint. In such BYE there are no Route
headers. In non-bridging calls Routes are correctly placed and the
message is routed to the first "hop".
When the error happens, this is written to a log:
WARNING: rr [loose.c:821]: after_loose(): no socket found for match
second RR
Here ([SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR) I have read this
is only a warning, but in my configuration it seriously influences the
message routing.
My setup is
phone1(192.168.10.3) <--TCP--> kamailio1(192.168.10.2) <--UDP-->
kamailio2(192.168.5.3) <--UDP--> phone2
On kamailio1 I generate dlg_end_dlg and the BYE is sent to phone1 and
phone2 directly.
I'm using Kamailio 4.0.4 on Debian machines.
How can I make the Kamailio1 to send the BYE to kamailio2 in the
transport layer bridging scenario? Do I have some misconfiguration or
this is not a correct behaviour?
Thanks for answer
Efelin
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
