The two configuration files are 100% identical. On 28 November 2012 19:01, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again and thank you for your help, > > This is what happened when I changed the flags to 8 and restarted both > kamailios > ACTIVE KAMAILIO > SET_NO:: 2 > SET:: 2 > URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs= > SET:: 1 > URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs= > > PASSIVE KAMAILIO > SET_NO:: 1 > SET:: 1 > URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= > URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= > > When I stop kamailio 1 kamailio two takes the Virtual IP and > everything works like a charm, when I start kamailio 1 again the same > issue appears calls are only routed to the 10.2.45.103 asterisk.... > > What might be the problem that they are in different set ? > > > On 28 November 2012 18:37, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well these are two different dispatcher groups, one is SET:1 10.2.45.98 >> where the calls are routed - the other one is SET:2 which you are definitely >> not calling in your ds_select() function. >> >> Also the flags=IP are, I think, saying that asterisk servers are inactive >> and kamailio is probing them, not sure about it. mine always show me >> flags=AP for active servers. >> >> Also how have you defined the >> >> ds_ping_reply_codes >> http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/3.2.x/modules_k/dispatcher.html#id2495999 >> >> Parameter such that if asterisk responds with a 484 or 404 or anyother >> negative response to the dispatcher OPTIONS SIP ping then consider it >> active. >> >> Hope this will get your issue resolved. >> >> The thing is the dispatcher in kamailio or load-balancer in OpenSIPS both >> set the Initial flags of all the servers in the table to Active/Enabled ! >> that means if I have a server which is down and I reload the dispatcher >> module it will mark that down server to UP and my calls will timeout trying >> to send calls to that instance ! >> >> Thanks, >> Sammy >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Samy, >>> >>> this is what I got: >>> >>> >>> SET_NO:: 2 >>> SET:: 2 >>> URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= >>> SET:: 1 >>> URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= >>> >>> >>> on both machines. Moreover now without any changes dispatcher is not >>> working at all. Only sending calls to the asterisk-1 (10.2.45.98) >>> >>> On 28 November 2012 18:20, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi again, >>> > >>> > I think instead of dispatcher show use "kamctl dispatcher dump" That >>> > will >>> > show you the kamailio status of these servers. The flag 0, I'm not sure >>> > about that I always use 8 to re-activate the server if the ping gets >>> > back. >>> > >>> > Hope to hear from you >>> > -- >>> > Sammy >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hello again, >>> >> >>> >> I was able to perform tests and this is the output: >>> >> Kamailio-1: 10.2.45.106 >>> >> Kamailio-2: 10.2.45.109 >>> >> Asterisk-1: 10.2.45.98 >>> >> Asterisk-2: 10.2.45.103 >>> >> >>> >> I can ping both asterisks from both kamailios >>> >> here are stats: >>> >> FROM KAMAILIO-1 >>> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 >>> >> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.315 ms >>> >> ^C >>> >> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- >>> >> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 773ms >>> >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.315/0.315/0.315/0.000 ms >>> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 >>> >> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.489 ms >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.268 ms >>> >> >>> >> FROM KAMAILIO-2 >>> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 >>> >> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.324 ms >>> >> ^C >>> >> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- >>> >> 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1036ms >>> >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.324/0.893/1.462/0.569 ms >>> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 >>> >> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.09 ms >>> >> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.350 ms >>> >> ^C >>> >> >>> >> Those are the 'kamctl dispatcher show' outputs: >>> >> KAMAILIO 1 >>> >> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show >>> >> dispatcher gateways >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | >>> >> description | >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >>> >> asterisk-1 | >>> >> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >>> >> asterisk-2 | >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> >>> >> KAMAILIO 2 >>> >> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show >>> >> dispatcher gateways >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | >>> >> description | >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >>> >> asterisk-1 | >>> >> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | >>> >> asterisk-2 | >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+ >>> >> >>> >> Both asterisks can also ping both kamailios >>> >> >>> >> ds_select_dst("1","4"); >>> >> >>> >> this is what I have in my route[TOASTERISK] >>> >> >>> >> Any thought guys ? >>> >> >>> >> Best regards, >>> >> Rumen >>> >> >>> >> On 28 November 2012 09:55, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Hello Samy, >>> >> > >>> >> > Thank you for the hint, I will test later today and let you know the >>> >> > results. >>> >> > >>> >> > Best regards, >>> >> > Rumen >>> >> > >>> >> > On 28 November 2012 07:00, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> Hi, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Just few quick questions , can you ping the second asterisk from >>> >> >> secondary >>> >> >> Kamailio ? what is the routing set for that. Does your second >>> >> >> asterisk >>> >> >> box >>> >> >> gets inactive in dispatcher show command after 30 seconds ? >>> >> >> Mine worked fine, the key is the linux routing table. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> BR >>> >> >> Sammy >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rumen Mihailov >>> >> >> <zealas1...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> .s. Thank you for creating such a wonderful product. Thank you !!! >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >>> >> >> list >>> >> >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> >> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
