Hello Samy,
this is what I got:
SET_NO:: 2
SET:: 2
URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=
SET:: 1
URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=
on both machines. Moreover now without any changes dispatcher is not
working at all. Only sending calls to the asterisk-1 (10.2.45.98)
On 28 November 2012 18:20, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I think instead of dispatcher show use "kamctl dispatcher dump" That will
> show you the kamailio status of these servers. The flag 0, I'm not sure
> about that I always use 8 to re-activate the server if the ping gets back.
>
> Hope to hear from you
> --
> Sammy
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> I was able to perform tests and this is the output:
>> Kamailio-1: 10.2.45.106
>> Kamailio-2: 10.2.45.109
>> Asterisk-1: 10.2.45.98
>> Asterisk-2: 10.2.45.103
>>
>> I can ping both asterisks from both kamailios
>> here are stats:
>> FROM KAMAILIO-1
>> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98
>> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.315 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics ---
>> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 773ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.315/0.315/0.315/0.000 ms
>> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103
>> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.489 ms
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.268 ms
>>
>> FROM KAMAILIO-2
>> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98
>> PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.324 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics ---
>> 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1036ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.324/0.893/1.462/0.569 ms
>> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103
>> PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.09 ms
>> 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.350 ms
>> ^C
>>
>> Those are the 'kamctl dispatcher show' outputs:
>> KAMAILIO 1
>> [root@kamailio-1 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show
>> dispatcher gateways
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs |
>> description |
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | |
>> asterisk-1 |
>> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | |
>> asterisk-2 |
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>>
>> KAMAILIO 2
>> [root@kamailio-2 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show
>> dispatcher gateways
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>> | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs |
>> description |
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>> | 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | |
>> asterisk-1 |
>> | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | |
>> asterisk-2 |
>>
>> +----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
>>
>> Both asterisks can also ping both kamailios
>>
>> ds_select_dst("1","4");
>>
>> this is what I have in my route[TOASTERISK]
>>
>> Any thought guys ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rumen
>>
>> On 28 November 2012 09:55, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Samy,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the hint, I will test later today and let you know the
>> > results.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Rumen
>> >
>> > On 28 November 2012 07:00, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Just few quick questions , can you ping the second asterisk from
>> >> secondary
>> >> Kamailio ? what is the routing set for that. Does your second asterisk
>> >> box
>> >> gets inactive in dispatcher show command after 30 seconds ?
>> >> Mine worked fine, the key is the linux routing table.
>> >>
>> >> BR
>> >> Sammy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rumen Mihailov <zealas1...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> .s. Thank you for creating such a wonderful product. Thank you !!!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> >>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
