On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.09.2010 17:12, schrieb Ovidiu Sas:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
>> the rtpproxy (k) module.
>> Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
>>
>> Why?
>> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
>> flag was deprecated);
>> - all functionality of force_rtp_proxy is provided by
>> rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer;
>> - rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config.
>>
>> Objections?
>
> I would prefer to keep force_rtp_proxy and make it detect late-offer-answer
> automatically. So just calling force_rtp_proxy() on INVITE, 200 and ACK and
> it should work in all cases. (just like mediaproxy)
What you propose is a new functionality. I would prefer a new name
(engage_rtp_proxy) for this function and still drop the old
force_rtp_proxy.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
