There is no other more user friendly procedure for the 200ok/ACK SDP
negotiation.
The existence of SDP in the initial INVITE must be checked.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Ovidiu Sas <o...@voipembedded.com>:
>> Why?
>> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
>> flag was deprecated);
>
> Hi, in case of "200/ACK SDP" rtpproxy_offer should be called in the
> 183/200 and rtpproxy_answer in the ACK, and for that the existance of
> a SDP body should be inspected in the initial INVITE, am I right? or
> is there a more user-friendly way to achieve this case?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <i...@aliax.net>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
