Henning - noted about this; I'm looking at how intrusive the diff is but a quick assessment shows that it shouldn't touch any modules outside tls.so.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 16:42, Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com> wrote: > Hello Richard, > > > > as we are in the code freeze for 6.0 already, it would be great if you > could quickly outline how intrusive the proposed tls_thread mode 3 would > be, e.g. would it touch all the modules etc.. > > We might consider maybe then adding it later. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Henning > > > > *From:* Richard Chan via sr-dev <sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org> > *Sent:* Freitag, 20. Dezember 2024 03:25 > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org > > > *Cc:* Richard Chan <shihping.c...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* [sr-dev] Heads-up: master/libssl - going to revert > tls_threads_mode=1 > > > > HI devs, > > > > In trying to solve the libssl3 issue the original attempt with > tls_threads_mode=1 turns out to be not quite correct. > > > > Since the release of 5.8 we have consistently recommended > tls_threads_mode=2 for users of libssl 1.1.1 and 3. > > > > For master/6.0.0-pre I will start to revert the changes of > tls_threads_mode=1. > > > > I will also add a new simpler mode tls_threads_mode=3 based on the diff by > > Ondrej Jirman <m...@xff.cz> (@meengu). > > > > Regards > > Richard > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
