@miconda regarding to this change
```
-                       *from = &si->su;
+                       memcpy(*from, &si->su, sockaddru_len(si->su));
```

This change is made within the function `find_listening_sock_info`. The 
function declaration looks as follows:
```
inline static int find_listening_sock_info(
                int s, union sockaddr_union **from, int type)
```
The `from` param is a pointer to pointer. It's presumed that at the moment when 
`find_listening_sock_info` is called the memory for `from` param should be 
already allocated.
This function is called in only a single place in the source code - 
[here](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925/files#diff-aee8567648ae9f54eaf1f7a0feb3302d981966a749b16710e2b457da7c22c412R1373)
 - and `*from` pointer refers to the `my_name` variable, which is a variable 
allocated on the stack.
So this `memcpy` function is copying the memory from `si->su` structure object 
into the `my_name` variable allocated on the stack. I do not see here anything 
incorrect.
However, maybe the passing of the `from` param as a pointer to pointer (`union 
sockaddr_union **from`) can be changed to passing as a pointer (`union 
sockaddr_union *from`) - to exclude a confision.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925#issuecomment-2262833391
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925/c2262833...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org

Reply via email to