As I keep trying to beat into people’s brains, Codes are a minimum. If the 
project is not design-build, then you need to look to see if there is a spec 
that asks for more. This phenomenon is not restricted to the west coast.   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Feb 21, 2024 at 9:08 AM,  <Travis Mack (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>           
>   
>
> As Steve points out, it is AM&M.    If you are a 3rd  party designer and 
> didn’t ask if there was an AM&M, as it is quite common in CA, then lesson 
> learned.    If the builder, owner or sprinkler contractor didn’t review prior 
> to bid then lesson learned for them.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> AM&M can be costly.    But it was owner/builder choice to encroach on the 
> setback.    So I assume they chose the cost of doing the AM&M was less 
> important than building into the setback.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> If you had the information up front and didn’t use it, then redo the design 
> and move on.    If the owner / builder had it and didn’t get it to you, 
> submit change order, redo the design and move on.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> As I was taught long ago, all education costs.    Some you pay to 
> universities and such.    Others you pay to the School of Hard Knocks.
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
>  Travis Mack, SET
>
>   
>
>  M.E.P.CAD| Instructor / Support
>
>   
>
>  181 N. Arroyo Grande Blvd. #105 I Henderson, NV 89074
>
>   
>
>   www.mepcad.com (http://www.mepcad.com/)   |  m: 480.547.9348|  Whatspp: 
> +14805479348
>
>   
>
>  Email: [email protected]
>
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>  AutoSPRINK    |    AutoSPRINK FAB    |    AutoSPRINK RVT    |    AlarmCAD
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> From:   [email protected]  <[email protected]>
>   Sent:  Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:52 AM
>   To:  'Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers'  
> <[email protected]>; 'Steve Leyton'  
> <[email protected]>
>   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> I am not sure, but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen rules related to wagering 
> on the forum.    I do not believe it would be appropriate however, in the 
> unlikely event of “off-track” betting on the outcome of a code application, 
> the house should get 10%.    No vig.
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>  Bob Caputo, CFPS
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>  President
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>  American Fire Sprinkler Association
>
>   
>
>  c:           760-908-7753
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>  p:
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>  214-349-5965 ext124   
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>  w:
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   firesprinkler.org (http://firesprinkler.org/)     
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>   (https://www.facebook.com/firesprinkler.org/)             
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> Treat Your Apprentices Like VIPs!
>
>   
>
> AFSA’s Virtual Instruction Program (VIP) for Apprentices is training that 
> comes straight from our expert instructors. They lead the way to ensure your 
> men and women are trained, letting you focus on OJT. Click   here 
> (https://www.firesprinkler.org/sprinkler-apprentice-training/)   to learn 
> more and enroll
>
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> From:   BRUCE VERHEI  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
>   Sent:  Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:54 AM
>   To:  Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers  
> <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])>; Steve Leyton  
> <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
>   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>
> Unfortunately I assume we can’t arrange wagers on this forum. I’d give odds 
> Steve L is correct on more than one of his points.   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> One more reason to follow the no installation prior to plans review practice. 
> I’ve gone round and round more than once on 13-D that just don’t work 
> hydraulically. Knowing there’s not enough margin to spend hours yakking with 
> the plan reviewer on these jobs I finally learned to ask ‘Is this already 
> installed?’ Uh, yeah. I was hoping to pick up permit today, for inspection 
> tomorrow. You gotta approve it the GC is riding me.
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> i wonder if the u/g is sized adequately.
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Best.   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>
> Bruce V.   
>
>   
>   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > On 02/20/2024 2:20 PM PST Steve Leyton  <[email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > If you have a set-back deficiency and the project was permitted with the 
> > upgraded sprinkler system as a condition of approval, it’s perfectly legit. 
> >      Before you designed the system, did the owner or their agent inform 
> > you that there were alternative means and methods required?        I would 
> > first ask them, because if the situation is what LACFD informed you that it 
> > is, then the owner has almost certainly been informed of these upgrades in 
> > writing and the information wasn’t conveyed to the construction team.      
> > Did you look at the code analysis in the plans to see if it’s there?      
> > Are you the contractor or a contract designer?        If you’re a 3rd  
> > party, did the contractor bid off of plans that may include this 
> > information and    they’re the ones that didn’t convey to you?
> >   
> >  Steve L.
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   From:   Owen Evans  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> >   Sent:  Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:39 PM
> >   To:   [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> >   Subject:  [Sprinklerforum] Modified 13D System per FD
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> > I designed a standard 13D system for   a new   SFR in Hermosa Beach Ca.. 
> > The city of   Hermosa Beach contracts with LA County for   their fire 
> > protection.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > I received corrections requiring a 4 head calculation, heads in all 
> > compartments and attic, and under all exterior overhangs. They call it a 
> > modified 13D system.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > I spoke with the plans examiner and he stated this is an LA country 
> > requirement with approval from the city of Hermosa Beach. I asked for the 
> > amendment that allows this “modified 13D” system. He stated that   because 
> > the SFR encroaches into the 5’ setback,     it’s an alternate means and 
> > method, no amendment required. This is going to result in a significant 
> > cost increase.   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Is this situation   legit?
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> > Owen Evans
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >    Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 
> > (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/aol-news-email-weather-video/id646100661)
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >
> >  _________________________________________________________
> >  SprinklerForum mailing list:
> >    
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> >
> >   
>   
>  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> mailing list: 
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>   
  
  
     
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to