Did I miss something? I thought you said 5 groups of 5x5x5 cubes stacked 2
high. That's only 125 sqft. Wouldn't it be cheaper to make a separate
space, either with two hour walls or to just extend the coverage beyond the
area with the higher demand as per NFPA. The solution seems so obvious and
simple but as I believe it was  Twain who said, "For every problem there is
a solution that's simple, obvious, and wrong." so I suspect mine is falling
into that category and believe I must have missed something in the
explanation.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:15 PM Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure if attachments are allowed, if yes this is the situation...
>
> I believe the liquid is classified as a low commodity, leaving the plastic
> containers as the driving force... ok, I'm on board with this.
>
> We are trying to reduce the overall plastic height or commodity
> classification... a Group A plastic upgrade at 10 feet is costing them six
> figures in FS upgrades (new underground, fire pump etc).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prahl, Craig/GVL <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 2:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Steve Mackinnon <[email protected]>; Art Tiroly <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: RE: question about Storage height
>
> You don't have 5 ft of commodity.  The liquid within the tote is
> irrelevant to the hazard.  You essentially have a plastic hazard that is 10
> ft in height.  Now, there are some schools of thought that derate the level
> of hazard due to the liquid acting as a heat sink and thereby providing a
> reduced potential for fire involvement when compared to that of the empty
> totes.  But, since there are empty as well as full and possibly partially
> full totes, it would be safer to assume the hazard as a Group A plastic at
> 10 ft in height and move on.
>
> Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection |
> [email protected] | www.jacobs.com
> 1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
> CONTACT BY: email or MS TEAMS
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Steve Mackinnon <[email protected]>; Art Tiroly <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: question about Storage height
>
> Thank you everyone who replied, it appears it's not as clear cut as one
> would think lol.
>
> The plastic tote below does have a solid top, but I would assume there
> would be opening in the cover to allow any spillage or leaks to fall into
> the vessel. And allow any sprinkler water to fill the totes... but again,
> these are one time usage only.
>
> Not sure if it helps, but there are only 3-5 of these in the warehouse...
>
> I just find it hard to wrap my head around protecting 10 foot of storage
> for only 5 feet of commodity.
>
> Thank you again!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Art Tiroly via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Art Tiroly <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: question about Storage height
>
> Is the spill container open top? That will be an issue. These sound like
> plastic totes. If the liquid is not combustible the empty tote is still a
> lot of plastic
>
> Art
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Scott Futrell via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Scott Futrell <[email protected]>; Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: question about Storage height
>
> You didn't mention what the liquid is. If it is a hazardous material as
> recognized by the International Fire Code then the 'empty' container is
> still considered full unless completely cleaned.
>
> Scott
>
> Office: (763) 425-1001 x 2
> Cell: (612) 759-5556
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 8:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: question about Storage height
>
> It should be 10 feet even though the other container is empty it's still
> plastic.
>
> Mike
> ________________________________
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> on
> behalf of Steve Mackinnon via Sprinklerforum <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:02 AM
> To: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Steve Mackinnon <[email protected]>; Peter Howard <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: question about Storage height
>
> Good morning all,
>
> We have a storage situation where the liquid commodity is in a 5 foot
> plastic storage cube, with an equally sized empty plastic container below.
>
> The empty container below is only there to act as a spill collection
> vessel.
>
> The question our office has been banging around, what is the storage
> height???
>
> Would this be considered 5 feet of storage or 10 feet?
>
> Would you take any exception to the plastic containers (like when we
> change the commodity classification with wood to plastic pallets)?
>
> Thank you in advance
> Steven
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http*3A*2F*2Flists.firesp__;JSUl!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!QrCp0eJxS7Ot1mmwCscvaG11e7ELPRSGIBZ4XbEWUGOe2OHepszwwba4Vr7yVuqKYw$
> rinkler.org%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> &amp;data=04%7C
>
> 01%7C%7C0d961840310a423de85308d9e0d49405%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%
>
> 7C1%7C0%7C637788025897874973%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ
>
> QIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=gZPzEokK%2FC%2F
> BPf%2FyCzVVjYGR3%2FRAFZEAkLsE2Cn2Qjk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!QrCp0eJxS7Ot1mmwCscvaG11e7ELPRSGIBZ4XbEWUGOe2OHepszwwba4Vr5wa9shEw$
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!QrCp0eJxS7Ot1mmwCscvaG11e7ELPRSGIBZ4XbEWUGOe2OHepszwwba4Vr5wa9shEw$
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!QrCp0eJxS7Ot1mmwCscvaG11e7ELPRSGIBZ4XbEWUGOe2OHepszwwba4Vr5wa9shEw$
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!QrCp0eJxS7Ot1mmwCscvaG11e7ELPRSGIBZ4XbEWUGOe2OHepszwwba4Vr5wa9shEw$
>
> ________________________________
>
> NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
> information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by
> unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
> and deleting it from your computer.
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to