What in the IBC is requiring this, the only difference I'm aware of (which is 
no longer a difference at least in the last cycle or two) is that Type V 
construction requires protection of porch/patio/decks.  I don't believe an exit 
corridor falls within those requirements?  The intent was to counteract patio 
heaters/grills etc as a potential ignition source.

Mike Morey
CFPS 3229 . NICET S.E.T. 123677
Project Manager . Fire Protection Group
Shambaugh & Son, LP an EMCOR Company
7614 Opportunity Drive . Fort Wayne, IN . 46825
direct 260.487.7824 /  cell 260.417.0625 /  fax 260.487.7991
email [email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Dane Long via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 12:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Dane Long <[email protected]>
Subject: Open or exterior corridors

 
BE ADVISED - This email originated outside EMCOR. 
 

I have a 13R project with exterior open corridors as seen in 13R (2016) Figure 
A.6.6.5(a). Per the IBC were being required to provide protection.

Can I apply 6.6.5.1.1?

6.6.5.1.1 Where sidewall sprinklers are installed beneath decks or balconies 
constructed with open wood joists, sprinklers shall be permitted to be 
installed with deflectors not less than 1 in. (25 mm) or more than 6 in. (152 
mm) below the structural members, provided that the deflector is not more than 
14 in. (356 mm) below the underside surface of the deck.

If so, does this restrict me from using EC head, since 13R only says "sidewall 
sprinklers" and since it's a combustible obstructed construction?
Therefore, requiring a smooth flat ceiling.

Thanks for your help in advance,

Dane Long, AET
Engineering Technician | Bamford Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc.
P:    785.825.7710
F:    785.825.0667
A:   1383 W. North Street  Salina, KS  67401



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 9:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Prahl, Craig/GVL <[email protected]>; Matt Grise <[email protected]>; 
Kevin Hall <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Thread connection holding on one thread only

The depth of engagement to form a leakproof connection is dependent on the pipe 
diameter and system pressure.

For general talking purposes per ASME B1.20.1, for NPT pipes, a 1.25" pipe is 
shown as having 11.5 threads per inch with the typical hand tightening 
limitation at 4.5 turns for a depth of 0.42 inches (<5 threads).  Past that to 
get to full engagement requires the use of a wrench.  Effective length of 
thread is shown as 0.707 inches.

So it's amazing that with only two threads for engagement it didn't come apart 
under the pressure test and stayed in place for 15 years. I would wonder if 
there are any other connections in a similar condition.

Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | 
[email protected] | 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.jacobs.com__;!!FaxH778!JByPw1WZ48LniB41DIoIfiJnySXCbZVFT8QpxPa9WEP920iNA-egD4MiEYOmc_KT$
 
1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
CONTACT BY: email or MS TEAMS



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 9:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Matt Grise <[email protected]>; Kevin Hall <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Thread connection holding on one thread only

If I recall from my book-learning days, there is a pretty well established 
minimum thread engagement that provides the full strength of a threaded 
connection. (maybe 3?). That may also only apply to bolts though.

Matt


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2022 8:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Kevin Hall <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Thread connection holding on one thread only

I do not believe one is sufficient. I recall a project where the specification 
limited the maximum number of exposed threads to 2 or 3. I'd have to do some 
research to find the product/installation standard that was referenced.


Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE

Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services

American Fire Sprinkler Association

[email protected]

214-349-5971


On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:16 AM Dan Arbel via Sprinklerforum < 
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Forum Members
>
> I have a case where 1.25" NPT pipe nipple was connected to 1.25" BSP 
> (as per British standard) pipe.
>
> Sprinkler System in interstitial space.
>
> There was only 2 threads engagement.
>
> After about 15 years somebody touched the a pipe and the connection 
> disengaged.
>
> I would appreciated the members opinion on the allegation that even 
> one thread engagement is sufficient providing sufficient strength.
>
> Dan Arbel
> Dan Arbel Risk Engineering Ltd
> Mail: [email protected]
> WEB SITE:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http
> s*3a*2f*2fwww.riskmanage.com__;JSUl!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo
> 1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-yghiPIMw$
> &c=E,1,rOBCJWaUiWX-Zi-j03j48v-ojODJ4zDjCTCn-XcTQUWSVSZzQRanv2vrdqlUogX
> nkOECEYOqMT2eMuzN6PVEfyuVyVF6Hoz4BiV1VyGvBRCcljgZH2U,&typo=1
> Mobile: +972-52-6611337
> Tel: +972-4-8243337
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http
> *3a*2f*2flists.firesprinkler__;JSUl!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo
> 1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-zXS7SC2A$
> .org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,RvPpy3ldS
> C8kzu280ouAOq2QKBzNGfMu7REiocN-XOdCtouKzXB4EaUtnbHa1UoPns-R2H1fzQj-fW-
> oIX3YW0Doh9ZL84fg3cNaQ0q1OQ,,&typo=1
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http*3a*2f
*2flists.firesprinkler.org*2flistinfo.cgi*https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!FaxH778!JByPw1WZ48LniB41DIoIfiJnySXCbZVFT8QpxPa9WEP920iNA-egD4MiEU7a5TFY$
&c=E,1,wikZY07kLJSV87o86Ivs1Jsxm4l75jKdQbbfbZ7tVZifvQRGY33Wh20_IAQ7wACFTF9yF
LpxM-xqELTjxDST6UJ7dCl0WTqJP_LkvfP8qA,,&typo=1__;JSUlJSU!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU
8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-w4GyP2OA$
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/spri
nklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo1tisvmulk9
8nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-w8lV3Y3w$

________________________________

NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information 
that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!FaxH778!JByPw1WZ48LniB41DIoIfiJnySXCbZVFT8QpxPa9WEP920iNA-egD4MiEYiB_lJs$
 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!FaxH778!JByPw1WZ48LniB41DIoIfiJnySXCbZVFT8QpxPa9WEP920iNA-egD4MiEYiB_lJs$
 

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege 
is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in 
error, please  immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, 
destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or 
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message 
if you are not the intended recipient.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to